I sing the praises of another ORGANIC baby food and yet wonder why these products aren't more advertised and readily available to the average consumer. With all the products that are pushed to children on a regular basis, it makes me ponder the questions I'm sure so many mothers ask themselves, WHY aren't these products more popular?
While having a conversation with fellow mothers in arms, we discussed why babies are so lethargic and sluggish when they should be bouncing and active and moving about. I also noticed that some babies are even more chunky that my babies are. At first I wondered if it's because my children were preemies but then I thought my babies have never eaten anything but organic foods. Could this have an effect on their energy levels and even their development? Are other products more fatty in content or filled with additives that are slowing our children down? I have found that my children do have more energy they play longer they are stronger and are developing way beyond the stages of their peers. Does baby' diet play a role in how they progress. I've even noticed that my twins are natural vegetarians. They don't like meats or any meals with meat content.
We are moving towards the stage of finger foods and I question whether or not some of the "foods" that are presented really that good for them. I actually heard of a pediatrician suggesting Cheetos puffs? WHAT are you kidding me? After all the hard work and research of finding organic healthy baby foods, after the efforts of our first lady to combat childhood obesity and all the talk of early juvenile diabetes and this woman wants me to give my children a greasy, fatty, artificially flavor snack to help with their hand eye coordination and get them to feed themselves all the while clogging their 10mos old arteries and starting them on a path of salty, couch potato diet! YEAH RIGHT, I'm going to do that (lol)
So why aren't organic products available in cheaper prices or in more store with the varieties they have on their websites and even more why aren't these products available to women on public assistance? Especially now if you think about it, there are so many women and children that are in need of asistance from the government you would think that a healthier alternative would be available to them if the object is to have a nutritian program in place to serve the public. I have noticed on several occassions that healthier alternatives to foods such as organic and products without GMI (genetically motified ingredients) aren't presented to families in lower income areas, which makes me think that there's a reason for this. If these fattier, greasier foods are what's available to the poorer communities then would it be fair to say that this is the state in which these people are expected to stay? If organic products aren't pushed by public assistance programs and aren't advertised regularly to lower income families and even more so made affordable to them then would it also be fair to say that these families are in some way ignored when it comes to the crisis of health and nutritian in America? or is it because organic foods are more expensive?
I leave you with love and support and hope that mothers of all economic backgrounds take heed to the nutritian and well being of their children, for their development and growth.
~Empress



